- About Spark
- College Admissions
- Transfer Admissions
- Private School Admissions
With rising numbers of students all over the country applying to college—especially the most selective schools, it is no wonder that they are grasping for every possible advantage. One of the most well-documented ways to increase your chances of admission to a top school is to apply early, either through Early Action (EA) or Early Decision (ED).
Harvard’s recent 2018 college admissions lawsuit unearths several common trends not widely disseminated outside of higher education circles before now.
Several top colleges and universities have recently revealed noteworthy leaps in the number of applications from last year (college class of 2021) to this year (college class of 2022).
At this point in the year, high school seniors have been receiving acceptances, rejections, or deferrals from their Early Decision schools, and they’re eagerly awaiting word on the applications they submitted for January deadlines. As we start to see the results of the 2016-17 college admissions cycle and consider what it might mean for students applying 2017-18, it’s worth looking back to see what admissions directors at colleges nationwide had on their minds this year.
On Wednesday, December 9, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments for the second time in Fisher v. University of Texas, a case that could have widespread repercussions for race-based admissions policies at U.S. colleges and universities. The circumstances behind the case revolve around Abigail Fisher's 2008 rejection by The University of Texas-Austin (UT), a determination that Ms. Fisher claims was reached only because she is Caucasian. This post examines potential outcomes of the case and what impact the Court's decision could have on college admissions in the future.
Spark provides customized guidance to help you get into your top-choice schools.